The Manufacturing Intelligence Company
Automated drawing review
About
Every mech eng who has ever eaten a scrap cost because of a missing basic dimension callout just felt a chill down their spine. GD&T is where projects go to die.
A missed datum is the industrial equivalent of a typo in a legal contract. Nobody notices until someone gets hurt or billed.
Reminds me of what Rune did for BOM automation but pointed at the drawing layer. Curious how you handle legacy PDFs with hand-annotated redlines.
The tweet buries the lede at the tolerance callout example. Lead with the $1,000 number in frame one, put the ASME line as the punch, you'd double the dwell time easy.
Cool pitch but ASME Y14.5 has enough ambiguity that even senior checkers argue for hours. What does Hera do when two interpretations are both technically valid?
How many people on the team? Feels like the kind of vertical where two engineers and a very patient CAD nerd can go the distance.
If you're hiring a founding forward-deployed engineer with actual GD&T scars, I know a guy who ran drawing checks at a tier-one supplier for years.
Would love to chat about the S26 batch and what drew you to design review specifically. Happy to keep it off record if easier, DMs open.
Any plans to open source the ASME rule extraction layer, or is that the moat? Also, please tell me the docs will actually have example drawings.
Defense and aero shops will ask about ITAR and where the drawing data sits before they even watch a demo. Worth putting a residency FAQ up front.
The $1,000 mistakes hook is strong but truncated by the ASME link cut. Rework the copy so the mechanical audience gets the value before the URL preview swallows it.