Back to directory
Enterprise infrastructure · Data platforms & warehouses

Instance

Ground truth for robot learning.

building @tryinstance (YC S26) I like robots! @MIT_LISLab MIT
San Francisco1.8K followers
TLVC Rating
Hook
Editing / Creativity
Copy
Sentiment of launch
Distribution strategy
Community Rating
No ratings yet
Your rating
Sign in to rate this launch.

About

Instance is a verification layer for robotics teams that automatically judges whether a robot actually completed a task from its rollout footage. A user describes the task, drops in a dataset of episodes, and Instance returns a pass or fail verdict for each rollout along with subtask captions explaining what happened. The team positions it as an accuracy and latency improvement over prompting frontier vision language models to grade robot behavior, which matters because reinforcement learning, evaluation, and data curation pipelines are increasingly bottlenecked by the cost of humans watching video to label success. The company is aimed at robot learning teams that generate large volumes of episodes and need trustworthy labels before those episodes feed back into training. According to the company site, Instance works across different robots and camera angles, and the launch demo lets prospective users verify their own episodes through a hosted console. This launch positions the product as the first public entry point (a demo and API) into what has so far been an internal tool. Instance is part of Y Combinator's S26 batch and is led by Lucy Cai, an MIT computer science graduate who did robotics research in CSAIL's Learning and Intelligent Systems group under Leslie Pack Kaelbling, with prior stints on satellite software at SpaceX, automated testing at Amazon, and BCI pipelines at Blackrock Neurotech. Her cofounders, per the company site, are longtime friends from middle school with engineering backgrounds spanning SpaceX, AWS, and NASA JPL.
Tags
<500KProduct launchExplainerB2BPre-launchUSFounder-led
Comments (9)
Sign in to join the discussion.
Pranav Rao6d ago

Claude Opus 4.8 is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that tweet given it doesn't exist yet. bold naming convention or time travel, either way I respect it.

Reyhaneh K.6d ago

the tweet just trails off mid-sentence and you expect me to click? masterclass in engagement bait or your paste buffer betrayed you.

Nneka O.6d ago

how big is the team on this? robot eval feels like a 40-person research lab problem and yet here we are with a landing page and a demo.

Tomás Lindqvist6d ago

ok wait, a success detector is actually the unsexy piece everyone in robotics has been quietly hacking together in notebooks. shipping it as a product is the move.

marco6d ago

hot take: whoever gets ground truth for robot rollouts becomes the datadog of embodied AI. this is a wedge, not a feature.

Clara Nordström6d ago

any chance of a deeper writeup on the eval methodology? happy to chat offline if you'd rather not spill in replies.

Yuki Tanabe6d ago

the site's typography is clean but that hero video needs a longer establishing shot before the failure clip. cuts too fast to register what went wrong.

Harish M.6d ago

curious what retention looks like once a customer's model stabilizes. do they keep paying you to grade rollouts or is this a one-time eval sprint?

zenithbyte6d ago

genuinely wild that this is being built without an agent framework wrapped around it. probably the last generation of tools that ships as a plain API before everything becomes a swarm.