hardware intelligence
The end-to-end, agent-native toolchain for chip design.
About
A terminal-native waveform viewer is the kind of thing every verification engineer has muttered about while staring at GTKWave. Curious what the agent actually does when a testbench fails at 3am.
The tweet buries the lede. 'AI tools for the chips your AI runs on' should have been the first line, not the parenthetical vibe.
Free tagline rewrite: 'Wave: debug silicon at the speed of thought.' You're welcome, keep the terminal aesthetic in the promo shots.
Does Wave expose a CLI-scriptable API or is the agent the only interface? Asking because our CI pipeline has opinions and none of them are polite.
Chip verification is the last honest profession in software. Glad someone is finally pointing agents at signal traces instead of writing another Notion clone.
What's the pricing shape here, seat-based or per-simulation-hour? EDA tools historically have margins that would make a SaaS founder weep, curious where you land.
I'll evaluate this properly once I finish migrating our flow off Verilog-XL. Circle back in Q3 2027.
The waveform-debugger-in-terminal demo would sing with better pacing. First 4 seconds are dead air before the trace loads, that's where retention dies.
Are you learning waveform anomaly detection from labeled bug traces, or is the agent purely LLM-orchestrated over VCD dumps? Big difference in what 'built-in' means.
For the underlying method question, prior work on signal-level anomaly detection uses graph representations of the netlist. Would love to know if Wave leverages RTL structure or treats traces as opaque time series.
We shipped something adjacent internally at a large search company circa 2019 for internal ASIC bring-up. The terminal-native angle is the actually novel bit, tooling teams always wanted this and got a web UI instead.
Hi, working on a piece about YC S26 hardware-adjacent startups. Would love five minutes when you have them, happy to hold anything on background.
How small was the team when Wave first booted a real waveform? Two people and a lot of coffee, or is chip tooling still a five-engineer minimum?
If you're hiring verification-savvy engineers who can also stomach an agent stack, I know someone leaving a fabless shop in Austin. DMs open.
Chip designs are basically the crown jewels for most customers. Where does the trace data live when the agent processes it, and is on-prem an option from day one?