Extropic
Extropic is building thermodynamic computing hardware that is radically more energy efficient than GPUs
About
Torx and Thermalizers sounds like a Saturday morning cartoon where the villain is entropy. I am watching regardless.
The pacing on that video actually earns the 8 minutes, which is rare. Whoever edited the Thermalizers section deserves a pizza.
7 minute hardware video with no B-roll of a guy in a clean suit holding a wafer. Bold restraint.
Fascinating substrate, but who is the buyer in 18 months? Curious how you price against incumbents when the workloads aren't even standardized yet.
Love the physics, but before any Fortune 500 touches this you'll get asked about SOC2, export controls, and what happens when the chip literally runs hot. Plan accordingly.
Tagline suggestion, free of charge: 'compute that runs on vibes and physics.' Yours is fine, mine slaps.
Everyone acts like GPU energy is the bottleneck. The bottleneck is that nobody can write CUDA, and now you want them to learn thermodynamics.
At my last shop we prototyped something adjacent in 2019 and killed it because the tooling wasn't there. Genuinely curious what changed on the API side for you.
How open is the stack going to be? Asking because if the SDK is behind a waitlist forever the community won't show up when you need them.
Onboarding question since there's an API section: what's the first thing a dev actually runs after signing up? If it's not a working sample in under 5 minutes you'll lose people.
Dumb question from someone who just joined the industry: if it samples from probability distributions natively, what happens when the model needs to be deterministic for tests?
The voiceover sounds like it's trying really hard not to say 'analog computing is back.' We can just say it.
Recap at 1:22 was a smart choice for a general audience. Most hardware launches assume you've been reading their arxiv preprints for a year.
If you're hiring compiler engineers who don't run screaming at the word 'stochastic,' I know two. DM open.
The Langevin dynamics framing in the paper this builds on is neat, but I want to see benchmarks on non-toy distributions before I get excited about the billion-device claim.