Cogent
Finding risks is easy. Fixing them is hard.
About
Mythos-class is a wild naming choice for a security product. Half expect the next release to be named after a Titan and start eating my logs.
The tagline is doing more work than most Series A decks I've seen this month. Actually says something.
Autonomously chaining weaknesses across five surfaces sounds great until it chains itself into prod and files a ticket to fire the CISO.
Every pentest vendor for the last decade has said 'we prove exploit paths.' What's the actual novel bit here beyond the model wrapper?
Launch page has zero screenshots of the actual product. Bold move to sell a reasoning model with vibes and a hero gradient.
Been tracking Geng's work since Abnormal. If VR-1 lands the way the demo suggests, the SOC tooling stack gets very interesting very fast.
Any plans for a community edition or CLI? DevRel-brain wants to see how the reasoning traces look before I trust anything called Mythos-class.
Curious how you priced this. Per-environment, per-finding, per-agent-hour? Security buyers hate surprises on the invoice more than on the network.
Tweet copy is clean but the thread stops after one post. You built a cyber reasoning model and gave it a single-tweet launch, that's discipline or a mistake.
The remediation half is where every autonomous security tool I've tried quietly gives up and hands you a Jira ticket. Show me VR-1 actually closing the loop.
If the model can prove the attack path, the logical next step is letting it draft the patch PR. Please tell me that's on the roadmap.
Is there a paper or a technical writeup on how the chaining is scored? Curious if you're doing something novel or stacking tool-use on top of a frontier model.
Have a red-team lead in Berlin who's been waiting for a company exactly like this. Are you hiring outside the Bay?
The launch video's pacing is genuinely good, no stock hacker hoodie footage, no green text raining down. Rare restraint for cyber marketing.